Posted on December 21, 2021 by Bernie Kilkelly – VP and Director of Corporate ESG Disclosure
#About the Climate Crisis #Biden-Harris Administration #Corporate Citizenship #Corporate CSR Reporting #Corporate Governance #Corporate Purpose #Corporate Responsibility #Corporate Sustainability #ESG Issues #Sustainability Reporting
December 21, 2021
by Bernie Kilkelly – VP and Director of Corporate ESG Disclosure, G&A Institute
Efforts by various international organizations to develop common global sustainability reporting standards continue to run into roadblocks, as different groups propose diverging approaches and methodologies to enhance ESG disclosure.
As reported by Responsible Investor (link below in our Top Stories), the G7 Impact Taskforce that was created in July (under the UK’s presidency of the G7), recently commented about reporting standards being developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), an even newer group launched at COP26 in Glasgow.
Rather than helping to find common ground around simplifying the alphabet soup of reporting frameworks and standards, the comments by the G7 Impact Taskforce (ITF) seemed to add to concerns that reporting standards could become more fragmented.
The ITF said it supports the approach of the ISSB, which is governed by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) body, to develop a global reporting baseline focusing on the impact of sustainability factors on company enterprise values.
But at the same time, it recommended that countries “build upon this” approach to include other impacts on stakeholders that this reporting baseline would not address.
The ITF’s comments seemed to show support for the broader “double materiality” reporting approach that focuses on the impacts of business activities on society and the environment. The “double materiality” approach is being used by the European Union’s accounting body — the European Financial Advisory Group (EFRAG) — to develop a new set of corporate sustainability disclosure standards.
While the ITF’s statement calls for mandatory impact accounting for businesses and investors that would include “harmonized standards,” the elusive search for a common global approach to sustainability reporting continues.
As we close out 2021 and embark on a New Year, the G&A Institute team will continue to monitor the efforts of these organizations and help you make sense of the ever-changing world of sustainability reporting and disclosure.
Best wishes from the G&A team to all for a Happy New Year!
Top Stories
Published by Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc.
Design & Contents Copyright © 2005 – 2025 By G&A Institute unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved. Sustainability Update™ is a service mark of G&A Institute, Inc.
