Introducing a new series of perspectives from G&A Institute…
by Hank Boerner – Chair & Chief Strategist, G&A Institute
We are bringing you a series of commentaries on the climate change crisis to share news, research results and perspectives to you in an organized way.
Fact: We are facing dire outcomes for humanity and planet if we don’t move faster with strategies and actions to address the challenges of climate change.
We’re calling our shared perspectives “About the Climate Change Crisis”.
Global Warming. Droughts. SuperStorms. Floods. Rising Seas. Outbreaks of forest fires. Loss of Species. Degradation of farmlands. Food Shortages.
These should be defined as crisis situations, no?
Despite these dangers, the public dialogue on “climate change” issues in the United States reflects in some ways the divide in public opinion on critical issues facing the American public, government, business, the financial sector.
Climate changing? Yes and No. Human activities causing the changes? Yes and No.
Should we be worried? Yes and No.
And so it goes.
The United States of America participated in the 2015 Paris (COP 21) meetings and signed on to the Paris Agreement along with almost 200 other nations, with President Barack Obama becoming a signatory in April 2016 and in September 2016 by presidential action presented the necessary documents to the U.N. General Secretary Ban Ki-moon.
The People’s Republic of China also presented the documents, a collaboration negotiated by President Obama. (This step by Barack Obama avoided presenting what amounted to an international treaty agreement to the U.S. Senate for ratification, required by the U.S. Constitution – approval assuredly would not happen in today’s political environment.)
The U.S. also contributed US$3 billion to the Green Climate Fund.
And so also by executive order, his successor in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump in March 2017 with swipe of a pen signaled the start of the complex and lengthy process of removing the U.S. from the historic Paris Agreement to limit the damage of global warming.
By his side: EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt (since gone from the environmental agency).
The backdrop: scientific reports that 2016 was the warmest year on record to date!
And credible scientists telling us that we have a decade at most to get control of climate change issues!
Prior to becoming president Donald Trump declared among other things that climate change was a Chinese hoax. (One of his positioning comments on the subject: “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive” – November 6, 2012 tweet.)
But climate change is real – and we face a climate crisis in 2019!
What Did the Current U.S.A. Leader Do?
President Trump on November 4, 2019 officially notified the international community – and specifically the community of the United Nations – that the process of withdrawal was beginning and would be complete one year from now — the day before Election Day 2020.
Note that in November 2018 the government of the United States of America published the fourth climate change assessment by key U.S. government agencies: the “Climate Science Special Report” was prepared by the U.S. Global Change Research Program of the Federal government. (We’ve including an overview in this series.)
The contents are of significance if you are an investor, a company executive or board member, an issue advocate, public sector officer holder or civic leader, consumer — or other type of stakeholder.
There are volumes of data and descriptions in the report presenting a range of “high probability” climate change outcomes in this the 21st Century.
Adding credibility to the Federal government’s report to the nation and the world: 11, 258 scientists in 153 countries from a broad range of disciplines (biosciences, ecology, etc.) published a report in the Bioscience Journal (November 2018) – “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency” – setting out a range of policies and actions that could be (adopted, taken) to address the emergency.
Good News About News Media
Good news from the purveyors of news to millions of people: the publishers of Columbia Journalism Review and The Nation created the “Covering Climate Now” (the initiative was launched in April 2019) intended to strengthen the media’s focus on the climate emergency. The lead media partner is The Guardian.
The founders are now joined by cooperating media that today reaches more than one billion people worldwide. Representatives of 350 newsrooms in 32 countries have joined to ramp up coverage of the climate crisis and possible solutions. The campaign is designed to strengthen the media’s focus on the climate emergency.
Combined, the cooperating media reach more than one billion people worldwide.
Participants in the campaign include Bloomberg, Agence France-Press, The Guardian, The Minneapolis Star Tribune, The New Jersey Star Ledger, The Oklahoman, Corporate Knights, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Seattle Times, La Republica (Italy), The Hindustan Times (India), Asahi Shimbun (Japan), La Razon (Spain), Greenbiz.com, Huffpost, Mother Jones, Rolling Stone, Scientific American, Teen Vogue, Vanity Fair, and many many other communications platforms.
Partner organizations in the campaign include wire services, news agencies, newspapers, magazines, digital news sites, journals, radio, podcasters, and institutions like Princeton University and Yale Climate Change & Health Initiative.
Could it be that the press, especially the U.S. press, can turn the tide of public opinion (with the naysayers and public doubters) with increasing and accurate coverage of the climate story?
Is the “media awake”? That question was posed and answered in September 2019 by Mark Hertsgaard (The Nation) and Kyle Pope (CJR editor) addressing the initiative.
Their comments are here for you: https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/climate-crisis-new-beginning.php
Is this where you get your news a participant? Check the list here: https://www.coveringclimatenow.org/partners
Participating publisher Corporate Knights points out to us that “climate change” was suggested as a term to use by pollster Frank Luntz to President George W. Bush instead of the more frightening term, “global warming”. Let’s not scare the people. Gently move them forward.
We do need to return to the more accurate and realistic title of global warming. The threats posed by warming of land and sea are visible to us – every day now!
But, OK, if climate change is the popular branding, then let’s talk about the climate change crisis or emergency (so says the media collaboration).
We’re presenting this series of climate change crisis commentaries to help to tell the story of the climate change crisis or emergency.
The title is About the Climate Crisis, following the lead of the collaborating journalists.
The Good News
The good news as background to the above is that cities and states are “still in” and implementing strategies and actions to follow the Paris Accord in their jurisdictions.
Corporations participated in the Conference of Parties (COP) meetings and especially the Paris COP 21 meetings.
Companies have been launching and reporting on their sustainability journey — actively addressing climate change issues — and investors are building more climate change considerations into their financial analysis and portfolio management.
Combined these actions are keeping the United States in the game and helping to maintain the nation’s edge in climate change matters. Of course, we can ALL do more!
Let us know how we are doing. And please do suggest to us issues and topics and developments that might be of interest to you and other readers of the G&A Institute’s Sustainability Update blog.
Please do Stay Tuned to our ongoing blog commentaries.
